<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prince Harry Charity Sentebale Hits the Headlines for all the Wrong Reasons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.donation4charity.org/blog/2008/childrens-charities/prince-harry-charity-sentebale-hits-the-headlines-for-all-the-wrong-reasons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.donation4charity.org/blog/2008/childrens-charities/prince-harry-charity-sentebale-hits-the-headlines-for-all-the-wrong-reasons/</link>
	<description>Helping you to help others</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.donation4charity.org/blog/2008/childrens-charities/prince-harry-charity-sentebale-hits-the-headlines-for-all-the-wrong-reasons/comment-page-1/#comment-6771</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donation4charity.org/blog/2008/donation4charity/prince-harry-charity-sentebale-hits-the-headlines-for-all-the-wrong-reasons/#comment-6771</guid>
		<description>Seriously £86,000 for the website... erm I&#039;ve looked at the site and it&#039;s nice but not £86,000 nice. Allowing for design and content it should be under £3000. They should have gone somewhere sensible like www.charity123.co.uk! I am totally shocked that any company would take that sort of money away from a charitable cause for something so basic (unless of course there&#039;s some massive backend system we can&#039;t see). I beleive that with charities the trustees can be liable for misuse of funds and I actually wonder if that would possibly be the case here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously £86,000 for the website&#8230; erm I&#8217;ve looked at the site and it&#8217;s nice but not £86,000 nice. Allowing for design and content it should be under £3000. They should have gone somewhere sensible like <a href="http://www.charity123.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.charity123.co.uk</a>! I am totally shocked that any company would take that sort of money away from a charitable cause for something so basic (unless of course there&#8217;s some massive backend system we can&#8217;t see). I beleive that with charities the trustees can be liable for misuse of funds and I actually wonder if that would possibly be the case here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
